PART THREE OF THREE

What would happen to our Bill of Rights if Spanish were to replace English as the predominant language of the United States? The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) quickly lead to the Central American Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA). Isn't it logical then to presume that the unification of the United States with Canada and Mexico is simply a precursor to a unification of North, Central, and South America?

The U.S. government, major media establishments, the education system, and many American companies embrace, promote, and in some cases favor the Spanish language over English.

Americans who understand the Constitution know that our rights are granted by the Creator and that the Bill of Rights merely recognizes our inherent rights under the rule of law. If the United States merges with outside foreign nations and drops the English language, it is reasonable to assume that our new government will cease to acknowledge our inherent rights, especially the right to keep and bear arms.

The United States is the only country in the world that recognizes its people as citizens and its government as servants of the people. The loss of our national identity will surely mean the loss of citizenship status for Americans in their own country, particularly when you consider the extreme anti-gun policies that dominate the rest of the Americas.

Although the proposed merger of North America was clearly outlined in a Council on Foreign Relations paper, this policy also appears to be right in line with the United Nations' Millennium Development Goals - a project publicly supported by President Bush. The United Nations supports a ban on private firearm ownership through a separate program ridiculously entitled, "Peace and Security Through Disarmament." One of the aspects of this sickening project is to reprogram or suppress our natural instinct of self defense, particularly that of men to act as protectors in society, as outlined in the Gender Perspectives portion of the project. And of course, they did not miss an opportunity to trot out the children thereby suggesting that if you disagree with their position you must be against children. In essence, the United Nations is attempting to downgrade the rights and status of American citizens to be on equal level of the poorest, least developed countries in the world. Why then does the United States still belong to the United Nations?

It is easy to see how such significant progress has been made in disarming America while our media watchdogs are either asleep at the wheel or complicit in our disarmament. Prior to the Internet and the growing popularity of patriotic media, Americans simply had no way of knowing what was going on. But those days are over.

It is not too late to defend our nation in a civilized manner although it seems as though we are quickly approaching the eleventh hour. Anyone who shares the vision of America, honors those who died for that vision, and believes that America should continue as a sovereign nation can make a difference by speaking out at every opportunity, getting involved in the education system, getting vocal with legislators, participating in organized events and making a commitment to defend America. It is not too late. You can make a difference.

Click here to read Part I

Click here to read Part II

Jennifer Freeman is Executive Director and co-founder of Liberty Belles, a grass-roots organization dedicated to restoring and preserving the Second Amendment.
http://www.libertybelles.org
jennifer@libertybelles.org